Jones v. State

414 So. 2d 610, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20147

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 So. 2d 132 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1982·No. No. AK-483·Published

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Jones appeals denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Jones’ trial counsel was sufficient. Taking notice of our file on Jones’ direct ap[611]*611peal, it is clear that the complained of errors never occurred.

The claim of denial of right to appeal was not made with specificity.

The sentence does not exceed the maximum.

McCORD, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Jones appeals denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Jones’ trial counsel was sufficient. Taking notice of our file on Jones’ direct ap[611]*611peal, it is clear that the complained of errors never occurred.

The claim of denial of right to appeal was not made with specificity.

The sentence does not exceed the maximum.

McCORD, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Jones v. State, 414 So. 2d 610, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

414 So. 2d 610 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.