Jones v. State
375 So. 2d 68, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15556
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 348 So. 2d 942 →
Opinion
Appellant attacks the order revoking his probation. The revocation was based on substantial grounds. However, the order also specifies appellant’s failure to pay the costs of probation supervision as an additional ground for revocation. This was improper because there was no evidence from which the court could find that appellant had the financial ability to pay such costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Accordingly, we strike the latter ground from the order. In all other respects it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 375 So. 2d 68, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
375 So. 2d 68 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coxon v. State
365 So. 2d 1067 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)