Jones v. State

303 So. 2d 31
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6420
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 1974·No. No. 74-538·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of assault and battery. After adjudication, he was sentenced to one year in the county jail. On this appeal, he urges error upon the denial of his challenge to the petit jury panel. It is argued that it affirmatively appeared that the jury commissioners failed to follow the provisions of the statute. See § 40.01(2) and (3), Fla.Stat. We hold that this record does not support appellant’s contention. See State v. Silva, Fla.1972, 259 So.2d 153. See also Rojas v. State, Fla. 1973, 288 So.2d 234.

Appellant’s contention that he was entitled to discharge because of the failure to try the misdemeanor charge within ninety days does not present error because it does not affirmatively appear from this record that he was available for trial during said period. Appellant offered no testimony as to availability after the court found that his failure to appear in a related case indicated unavailability.

Appellant’s remaining points go to procedural questions. Each has been reviewed and found not to present error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 303 So. 2d 31 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

303 So. 2d 31 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Silva
259 So. 2d 153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Rojas v. State
288 So. 2d 234 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)