Jones v. State
262 So. 2d 249, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6733
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 So. 2d 326 →
Opinion
We have examined the record and briefs filed in this cause. We are of the opinion that the prosecutor’s statements concerning the defendant’s previous criminal activity were properly admitted under the rule enunciated in Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The remainder of [250]*250defendant’s arguments are equally without merit. We therefore,
Affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 262 So. 2d 249, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6733 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
262 So. 2d 249 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
110 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)