Jones v. Southcorr, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. Southcorr, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 F. App'x 291
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2004·No. 04-1972·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1972

TUCSON W. JONES; YVONNE C. JONES,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

SOUTHCORR, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-499-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tucson W. Jones, Yvonne C. Jones, Appellants Pro Se. Hamlin Landis Wade, Jr., Melissa Megan Kidd, HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PPLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tucson W. Jones and Yvonne C. Jones appeal the district

court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in this Title

VII action alleging race discrimination in employment. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v.

Southcorr, LLC, No. CA-03-499-1 (M.D.N.C. filed July 8, 2004;

entered July 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Southcorr, LLC, (4th Cir. 2004).

Jones v. Southcorr, LLC (Jones v. Southcorr, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.