Jones v. Pierce

293 S.W.3d 453, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 921, 2008 WL 2651892
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 2008·No. ED 90052·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Officer Dawn Pierce and Officer Taren Walton appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding them liable on Sharon Jones’s claim of negligence. We find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Pierce, 293 S.W.3d 453, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 921, 2008 WL 2651892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

293 S.W.3d 453 (Jones v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. TELLE
293 S.W.3d 453 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)