Graham v. TELLE
293 S.W.3d 453, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 923, 2008 WL 2651876
Opinion
ORDER
Jim Graham appeals the judgment of the trial court sustaining Charles Telle’s motion for a directed verdict on Graham’s breach of contract claim. We find that the trial court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of Telle. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham v. TELLE, 293 S.W.3d 453, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 923, 2008 WL 2651876 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
293 S.W.3d 453 (Graham v. TELLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Pierce
293 S.W.3d 453 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)