Jones v. Myrtle Desk Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Jones v. Myrtle Desk Company

141 S.E.2d 632, 264 N.C. 401, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1203

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 5, 1965

Docket690

StatusPublished

Cited by64 cases

This text of 141 S.E.2d 632 (Jones v. Myrtle Desk Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Myrtle Desk Company, 141 S.E.2d 632, 264 N.C. 401, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1203 (N.C. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR CüRiam.

Counsel for plaintiff has presented the contentions of his client, both as to the facts and law, with thoroughness, force and competency. These contentions have been fully considered in our review of the record. However, we find nothing which justifies a remand of the cause or a reversal of the judgment below. Review in Supreme Court is limited to questions of law and legal inference. The findings of fact of the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal when supported by competent evidence, even though there be evidence that would support findings to the contrary. The record in this case contains competent supporting evidence for each finding of fact. The findings are positive and cover all crucial facts upon which the right to compensation depends. The facts found support the conclusion that plaintiff’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment with defendant employer. Bell v. Dewey Brothers, Inc., 236 N.C. 280, 72 S.E. 2d 680.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR CüRiam.

Counsel for plaintiff has presented the contentions of his client, both as to the facts and law, with thoroughness, force and competency. These contentions have been fully considered in our review of the record. However, we find nothing which justifies a remand of the cause or a reversal of the judgment below. Review in Supreme Court is limited to questions of law and legal inference. The findings of fact of the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal when supported by competent evidence, even though there be evidence that would support findings to the contrary. The record in this case contains competent supporting evidence for each finding of fact. The findings are positive and cover all crucial facts upon which the right to compensation depends. The facts found support the conclusion that plaintiff’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment with defendant employer. Bell v. Dewey Brothers, Inc., 236 N.C. 280, 72 S.E. 2d 680.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 S.E.2d 632, 264 N.C. 401, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-myrtle-desk-company-nc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack