Jones v. Morgan

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 25, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-02100·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 Edward Jones, 5 Case No. 2:23-cv-02100-JAD-MDC Plaintiff, 6 vs. ORDER 7 Daryl Morgan et al.,

8 Defendants.

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (EFC NO. 1) AND COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1-1) 9

11 Pro se plaintiff Edward Jones filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a proposed 12 complaint. ECF Nos. 1 and 1-1. The Court grants his IFP application. ECF No. 1. Since plaintiff is 13 incarcerated, the Court orders plaintiff must pay the initial partial filing fee of $60.66 toward the full 14 $350 filing fee. 15 16 I. Plaintiff’s IFP Application 17 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a plaintiff may bring a civil action "without prepayment of fees or 18 security thereof" if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff "is unable to 19 pay such fees or give security therefor." If the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h), 20 as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), he must pay the entire fee in installments, 21 regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. 22 Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 23 Under the PLRA, a prisoner seeking leave to proceed IFP must submit a "certified copy of the 24 trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the six-month period 25 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the Court must assess an initial 1 payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the 2 average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner 3 4 has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution having custody of the 5 prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any 6 month in which the prisoner's account exceeds $10, and forward those payments to the Court until the 7 entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Even if this action is dismissed, the prisoner must 8 still pay the full filing fee pursuant to § 1915(b) and the monthly payments from his inmate account will 9 continue until the balance is paid. 10 Plaintiff is currently incarcerated. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed a declaration and a certified copy of 11 the trust fund account statement per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff's average monthly balance is 12 $65.79, and his average monthly deposits are $303.34. The institution calculated that his partial filing 13 fee should be $60.66. The Court grants plaintiff's IFP application, and the Court orders plaintiff to pay 14 the initial partial filing fee of $60.66. The entire $350 filing fee will remain due from plaintiff, and the 15 institution where plaintiff is incarcerated will collect money toward the payment of the full filing fee 16 17 when plaintiff's institutional account has a sufficient balance, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915. The entire 18 $350 filing fee will remain due and payable and will be collected from plaintiff's institutional account 19 regardless of the outcome of this action. 20 Upon receipt of the initial partial filing fee, the court will screen plaintiff's complaint as required 21 by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(a); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en 22 banc) (noting that § 1915(e)'s screening requirement "applies to all in forma pauperis complaints"); see 23 also Plaintiff v. Lever, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53688 at 5. If the complaint states a valid claim for relief, 24 the court will direct the Clerk of the Court to issue summons to the defendant(s) and instruct the United 25 2 States Marshal Service to serve the summons and complaint. Cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3); LSR 1-3(c) 1 (requiring that a prisoner's initial partial filing fee be paid "before the Court will order service of 2 process"). 3 4 ACCORDINGLY, 5 IT IS ORDERED that Jones’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is 6 GRANTED. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has until Friday, February 23, 2024, to pay an initial 8 partial filing fee in the amount of $60.66 (toward the full $350 filing fee). 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons. The 10 Court will issue a screening order on the complaint after Jones pays the initial filing fee of $60.66 and 11 the Court will address the issuance of summons at that time, if applicable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court MAIL plaintiff two copies of this 13 Order. Plaintiff must make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this Order attached to a 14 check in the amount of the initial partial filing fee. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison 16 17 Litigation Reform Act, beginning the month following plaintiff's payment of the initial partial filing fee, 18 the Clark County Detention Center must forward payments from the account of Edward Jones 19 (8593738) to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding 20 month's deposits (in months that the account exceeds $10.00) until the full $350 filing fee has been paid 21 for this action. If this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 1915(b)(2). 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff is transferred, the Accounting Supervisor at Clark 24 County Detention Center is directed to send a copy of this Order to the new place of incarceration and 25 3 indicate the amount that plaintiff has paid towards his filing fee so that funds may continue to be

5 deducted from his account.

3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must send a copy of this Order to the 4 || Finance Division of the Clerk's Office and to the Clark County Detention Center Accounting Supervisor, 5 South Casino Center Boulevard, Las Vegas, NV 89101.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Morgan, (D. Nev. 2024).

Jones v. Morgan (Jones v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Andrews v. King
398 F.3d 1113 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Lopez v. Smith
203 F.3d 1122 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)