Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

Um'ted States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

STEPHANIE R. JONES, Petitioner,

V.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

2012-3120

Petition for review of the Merit Systerns Protection Board in case no. DA0752110468-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Department of the Army (Army) moves to reform the caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of

STEPH.ANIE JONES V. MSPB

jurisdiction Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in

this petition for review. Accordingly, I'r ls ORI)ERED THAT:

The motion to reform the official caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing

of this order.

JUL 1 6 2012

Date

cc: Stephanie J ones

Matthew F. Scarlato, Esq.

Nicole DeCrescenzo, Esq. s21

FOR THE COURT

/S/ Jan H@rbal;,; n

J an Horbaly Clerk |LED ve,e";;§s§.l*‘.§.§%%f°“ JU|`_ 1 6 2012 JAN HORBALY

CI.ERK