Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BRYANT C. JONES, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD Respondent. ____________________
2010-3074 ______________________
Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in Case No. CH0752090905-I-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
GREGORY T. MITCHELL, Law Office of Gregory T. Mitchell, of Homewood, Illinois, argued for petitioner.
DAVID S. BROOKS, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were JAMES M. EISENMANN, General Counsel, and KEISHA DAWN BELL, Deputy General Counsel. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (BRYSON, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 2, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly —————————— —————————— Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.