Jones v. Ludman Corp.

190 So. 2d 760, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3322
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1966
DocketNo. 35396
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 190 So. 2d 760 (Jones v. Ludman Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Ludman Corp., 190 So. 2d 760, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3322 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

DREW, Justice.

The petitioner seeks review of an order of the commission reversing an award of temporary total disability compensation for the months of February and March 1963. The commission found that this claim for additional compensation, filed in October 1964, was precluded by the terms of F.S. Section 440.28, F.S.A., providing a compensation award may be modified only upon application “prior to two years after the date of the last payment of compensation’’ pursuant thereto.1

Petitioner’s initial claim was determined by an order under which the last payment of permanent partial compensation was made in 1960. Remedial care has since been furnished under that and subsequent orders and is not here in dispute. An intervening award of further temporary total compensation was in 1963 reversed, and certiorari was denied in this Court on June 24, 1964. Jones v. Ludman Corp., 165 So.2d 767.

Petitioner contends that his current claim is not one for modification but simply for additional benefits and should be governed by Sec. 440.19(1) (a).2 The language of that section is limited, however, as already noted in the earlier decision relied on by the commission,3 to the situation where payments are made without an award, in which case further claims may be made within two years after payment of compensation or remedial treatment. In view of the clear distinction made in this instance and throughout the act between medical benefits and disability compensation, we do not find error in the cited decision nor can we ignore the explicit provision of Sec. 440.28 by which a determination of disability compensation becomes final and unalterable unless modified upon [762]*762petition filed within the specified time after the last payment of compensation.

Other contentions by petitioner in contest of the orders of the commission and deputy in this cause have been considered and found to be without merit.

Certiorari denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. EG & G Florida, Inc.
879 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Keller Kitchen Cabinets v. Holder
586 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
University of Florida v. McLarthy
483 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Bassett's Dairy v. Thomas
429 So. 2d 1356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Watson v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
288 So. 2d 193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Brown v. Giffen Industries, Inc.
281 So. 2d 897 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 2d 760, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-ludman-corp-fla-1966.