Jones v. Ludman Corp.
This text of 165 So. 2d 767 (Jones v. Ludman Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 27, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the cross petition, the record and briefs lead us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross petition are therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 So. 2d 767, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-ludman-corp-fla-1964.