Jones v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jones v. Jones

69 A.D.2d 875, 416 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11598

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 A.D.2d 875 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Jones, 69 A.D.2d 875, 416 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 20, 1978, as granted the plaintiff wife temporary custody of the two infant children, alimony pendente lite in the amount of $350 per week, child support of $150 per week and an interim counsel fee of $5,000. Order afiirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The best protection for parties aggrieved by a temporary order for support in a matrimonial action is to proceed to a speedy trial (Bernstein v Bernstein, 36 AD2d 620). We have considered the contentions of the appellant and find them to be without merit. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 20, 1978, as granted the plaintiff wife temporary custody of the two infant children, alimony pendente lite in the amount of $350 per week, child support of $150 per week and an interim counsel fee of $5,000. Order afiirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The best protection for parties aggrieved by a temporary order for support in a matrimonial action is to proceed to a speedy trial (Bernstein v Bernstein, 36 AD2d 620). We have considered the contentions of the appellant and find them to be without merit. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 875, 416 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack