Ellenis v. Ellenis
This text of 76 A.D.2d 880 (Ellenis v. Ellenis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 5, 1979, which denied her motion to renew her application for increased pendente lite relief. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. As we have frequently stated, a speedy trial is the most effective remedy for any seeming inequity in an award of support pendente lite (see, e.g., Fitzgibbon v Fitzgibbon, 74 AD2d 818; Jones v Jones, 69 AD2d 875; Lemme v Lemme, 63 AD2d 695). Margett, J. P., Martuscello, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 A.D.2d 880, 432 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellenis-v-ellenis-nyappdiv-1980.