Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ellenis v. Ellenis

Ellenis v. Ellenis

76 A.D.2d 880, 432 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11953
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1980·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 5, 1979, which denied her motion to renew her application for increased pendente lite relief. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. As we have frequently stated, a speedy trial is the most effective remedy for any seeming inequity in an award of support pendente lite (see, e.g., Fitzgibbon v Fitzgibbon, 74 AD2d 818; Jones v Jones, 69 AD2d 875; Lemme v Lemme, 63 AD2d 695). Margett, J. P., Martuscello, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellenis v. Ellenis, 76 A.D.2d 880, 432 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

76 A.D.2d 880 (Ellenis v. Ellenis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lo Palo v. Lo Palo
114 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
112 A.D.2d 154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
De Mato v. De Mato
101 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Aaron v. Aaron
100 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
McKee v. McKee
96 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Noll v. Noll
94 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Chernofsky v. Chernofsky
90 A.D.2d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Seletsky v. Seletsky
87 A.D.2d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)