Jones v. Daniel

169 S.E. 310, 177 Ga. 22, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 100
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1933
DocketNo. 9283
StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.E. 310 (Jones v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Daniel, 169 S.E. 310, 177 Ga. 22, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 100 (Ga. 1933).

Opinions

Beck, P. J.

1. Where a veteran! who served in the world war received a sum of money as compensation for disability attributable to the service, and invested a part of the sum so received in a lot of land in the City of Atlanta, and the sum thus derived from his compensation was only a part of the purchase-price of the lot in question, and in subsequent years the property has declined in value until it is worth much less than it was when purchased, and the taxable value of the property is consequently less than when it was purchased, the veteran is entitled to a proportionate abatement of the amount of taxes which would have been due upon the lot of land had it remained of the same value as when purchased, but he is not entitled to have the entire amount derived from his compensation paid him by the Government deducted from the amount of the value of the property after its decline in value.

2. Applying the ruling that there should only have been a proportionate deduction from the amount of taxes which would have been due had the property not declined in value, the court below did not err in refusing an

injunction. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices ooneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Atlanta v. Stokes
165 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.E. 310, 177 Ga. 22, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-daniel-ga-1933.