Jones v. Chandler

76 S.E.2d 239, 88 Ga. App. 105, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1021
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. Chandler. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 Ga. App. 103
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 2, 1953·No. 34534·Published

Opinion

Sutton, C. J.

The question in this case is identical with the question involved in Jones v. Chandler, ante, and this case is controlled by the ruling there made.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton and Worrill, JJ., concur. Nall & Sterne, Haas, Hurt & Peek, A. Paul Cadenhead, for plaintiff in error. Poole, Pearce &'Hall, C. A. Herbig, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Chandler, 76 S.E.2d 239, 88 Ga. App. 105, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1021 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953).

76 S.E.2d 239 (Jones v. Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.