Jones v. Campbell Co.
This text of 353 S.W.2d 208 (Jones v. Campbell Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The sole issue on this appeal is whether a woman who knowingly lived in adultery with an employee who meets with a fatal accident while at work can recover workmen’s compensation benefits as his dependent.
The determinative facts are not in dispute since appellant admits that she knew the deceased employee had a wife from whom he was not divorced, nevertheless, she lived with him as his wife and was supported by him for approximately ten months preceding his death. The Workmen’s Compensation Board dismissed her claim for compensation and the Board’s order was upheld by the circuit court.
While appellant qualifies as a dependent under the language used in KRS 342.075(3), we have heretofore read into this subsection a rule of public policy which precludes the recovery of compensation under circumstances such as are disclosed in the instant case. In Nall v. Wakenva Coal Co., 236 Ky. 598, 33 S.W.2d 631, 635, it was stated that “a sound public policy forbids the allowance of compensation founded on a relationship known to be illicit.” This rule was also approved and applied more recently in Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Hensley, 314 Ky. 85, 234 S.W.2d 317, and in Hatfield Campbell-Creek Coal Co. v. Adams, 275 Ky. 744, 122 S.W.2d 787. On the authority of these cases we are sustaining the judgment upholding the order of the Board dismissing appellant’s claim.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 S.W.2d 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-campbell-co-kyctapp-1961.