Jones v. Camden Police Department

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7393

ANDRE JONES,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT; E. R. COREY,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-02161-DCN)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Andre Jones appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Jones v. Camden Police Dep’t, No. 3:09-

cv-02161-DCN (D.S.C. Sept 1, 2010; Sept. 15, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED