Jones v. Camden Police Department

417 F. App'x 351
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2011·No. No. 10-7393·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre Jones appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Camden Police Dep’t, No. 3:09-cv-02161-DCN, 2010 WL 3452338 (D.S.C. Sept 1, 2010; Sept. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Camden Police Department, 417 F. App'x 351 (4th Cir. 2011).

417 F. App'x 351 (Jones v. Camden Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Camden Police Department
181 L. Ed. 2d 158 (Supreme Court, 2011)