Home/Supreme Court/Jones v. California

Jones v. California

374 U.S. 501, 83 S. Ct. 1878
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 17, 1963
Docket649, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 374 U.S. 501 (Jones v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. California, 374 U.S. 501, 83 S. Ct. 1878 (1963).

Opinion

374 U.S. 501 (1963)

JONES
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 649, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hugh E. Maness v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary
385 F.2d 943 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
People v. Jones
225 Cal. App. 2d 434 (California Court of Appeal, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 U.S. 501, 83 S. Ct. 1878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-california-scotus-1963.