Jones v. Annucci
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DANIEL JONES, Plaintiff, 1:23-CV-6917 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Commissioner, NYS DOCCS, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated August 8, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP” or “IFP application”) and prisoner authorization or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action. By order dated August 9, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to resubmit the signature pages of his complaint and his motion for the appointment of counsel with original signatures. That order also specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application and prisoner authorization or paid the fees, and he has not submitted signed signature pages. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice and denies any pending motions as moot. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment dismissing this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2023 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Annucci (Jones v. Annucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.