Jones, H. v. Ott, R

168 A.3d 1238, 2017 WL 1215513, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 756
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 3, 2017
DocketJones, H. v. Ott, R - No. 442 WAL 2016 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 A.3d 1238 (Jones, H. v. Ott, R) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones, H. v. Ott, R, 168 A.3d 1238, 2017 WL 1215513, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 756 (Pa. 2017).

Opinion

*1239 ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.

Absent an express request by the trial court to place any objections on the record, is a challenge to a trial court’s jury instructions preserved pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 227.1, if a party submits specific proposed points for charge to the trial court at the time of charging conference, and challenges the trial court’s failure to include the specific points in a post-trial motion?

The Application for Costs and Counsel Fees Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2744 is also DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones, H., Aplt. v. Ott, R.
191 A.3d 782 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.3d 1238, 2017 WL 1215513, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-h-v-ott-r-pa-2017.