Jones-El v. Godert
This text of Jones-El v. Godert (Jones-El v. Godert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION
EUGENE K. JONES-EL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:18-CV-65-JMB ) CHANTAY GODERT, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff previously requested the appointment of counsel in this matter. On December 11, 2019, the Court appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff for discovery on damages and for any trial on the issue of damages and prospective relief. (ECF No. 77) On January 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 81), and on January 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support (ECF No. 82). Plaintiff is advised that the Court will not accept or rule future pro se filings by Plaintiff. See, e.g., United States v. Halverson, 973 F.2d 1415, 1417 (8th Cir. 1992) (noting that the Eighth Circuit's policy is not to accept pro se filings when the appellant is represented by counsel). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall not accept for filing any pro se briefs, pleadings, or other papers. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff, Eugene Jones-El, #180162, Northeast Correctional Center, 13698 Airport Road, Bowling Green, MO 63334. /s/ John M. Bodenhausen JOHN M. BODENHAUSEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated this 23rd day of January, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones-El v. Godert, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-el-v-godert-moed-2020.