Jonap v. Siebert

144 N.Y.S. 7
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 144 N.Y.S. 7 (Jonap v. Siebert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jonap v. Siebert, 144 N.Y.S. 7 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff installed under a written contract in defendants’ house a water pump, and sues for the balance of the purchase price. The pump was installed prior to September, 1912, and defendants used the same, apparently continuously, until the city’s water pressure made it unnecessary, some two months later. The defense is that the pump “ran hot” because its shaft was out of alignment. In view, however, of defendants’ retention and use of the pump, the defense, even if. proved, was unavailing. Logan v. Berkshire Apartment House, 3 Misc. Rep. 296, 22 N. Y. Supp. 776; Turl v. Knabe, 26 Misc. Rep. 770, 56 N. Y. Supp. 1017. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turl v. Knabe
26 Misc. 770 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Logan v. Berkshire Apartment Ass'n
22 N.Y.S. 776 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 N.Y.S. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonap-v-siebert-nyappterm-1913.