Jonah Addis v. Deauna McQueen
This text of Jonah Addis v. Deauna McQueen (Jonah Addis v. Deauna McQueen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ June 02, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21I0212. JONAH ADDIS v. DEAUNA MCQUEEN.
On April 5, 2021, Jonah Addis filed this application for interlocutory appeal,1 in which he challenges two orders entered by the trial court: (1) a February 18, 2021 “order on [Addis’s] motion to set aside judgment on judge’s order on supersedeas bond,” and (2) a December 20, 2019 “interlocutory order of relief.”2 The record does not contain a certificate of immediate review for either order. We lack jurisdiction. To obtain review of the trial court’s orders, Addis was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review within ten days of the orders and filing an application within ten days of the certificate. See Mullinax v. State, 271 Ga. 112, 112 (1) (515 SE2d 839) (1999); Howard v. State, 194 Ga. App. 857, 857 (392 SE2d 562) (1990). To the extent the trial court’s orders are subject to direct appeal, we would still be required to dismiss Addis’s application because it is untimely. See Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486, n. 1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004) (“This Court will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order complained of is subject to direct appeal and the applicants have not otherwise filed a notice of
1 Addis filed his application in the Georgia Supreme Court, which transferred it to this Court. Case No. S21I0940 (Apr. 29, 2021). 2 Addis previously filed an application for interlocutory appeal from the December 20, 2019 order, and this Court granted that application on the basis that the order was subject to direct appeal. Case No. A20I0204 (Apr. 6, 2020). It is unclear whether Addis filed a direct appeal following the grant of that application. appeal.”) (emphasis supplied). Addis’s failure to follow the appropriate appellate procedure deprives this Court of jurisdiction over his application, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/02/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jonah Addis v. Deauna McQueen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonah-addis-v-deauna-mcqueen-gactapp-2021.