Jolly v. Wainwright

175 So. 2d 245, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4194
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1965·No. No. 6176·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court on a petition of Robert Jolly for writ of habeas corpus.

It appears that the defendant is in the custody of the Division of Corrections of Florida as a result of judgment and sentence by the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida. The petitioner alleges that he was apprehended in Kentucky and forcibly brought to Florida for trial, was not extia-dited and did not waive extradition.

A prisoner who has been convicted of a crime and sentenced to imprisonment therefor, after having been given a fair trial in accordance with constitutional procedural safeguards, is not entitled to relief by way of habeas corpus merely because he was brought within the court’s jurisdiction by reason of a “forcible abduction” or by an abuse of legal process. Frisbie v. Collins, 1952, 342 U.S. 519, 72 S.Ct. 509, 96 L.Ed. 541; Hobson v. Crouse, 10 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 561; Hunter v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 415, Opinion filed April 27, 1965.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of ha-beas corpus is

Denied.

SMITH, C. J., and SHANNON and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jolly v. Wainwright, 175 So. 2d 245, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

175 So. 2d 245 (Jolly v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Akins v. Hamlin
327 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Grimes v. State
244 So. 2d 130 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Goldsmith v. State
230 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Pinellas Central Bank & Trust Company
175 So. 2d 245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)