Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Goldsmith v. State

Goldsmith v. State

230 So. 2d 189, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6995
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 1970·No. No. M-28·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs having been read and given full consideration and appellant [190] having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed. Hunter v. State, 174 So.2d 415 (Fla.App.3d, 1965); Jolly v. Wainwright, 175 So.2d 245 (Fla.App.2d, 1965).

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldsmith v. State, 230 So. 2d 189, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6995 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

230 So. 2d 189 (Goldsmith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. State
174 So. 2d 415 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Jolly v. Wainwright
175 So. 2d 245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)