Jolley v. Jolley

549 P.2d 1407, 92 Nev. 298, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 595
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 25, 1976·No. 8168·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The district court entered judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage and distributing the community property. Appeal is *299 taken from, inter alia, the property distribution. Since the division thereof essentially was equal, we perceive no abuse of discretion. NRS 125.150; Fox v. Fox, 81 Nev. 186, 196, 401 P.2d 53 (1965); Weeks v. Weeks, 75 Nev. 411, 415, 345 P.2d 228 (1959).

Additional grounds of appeal are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jolley v. Jolley, 549 P.2d 1407, 92 Nev. 298, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 595 (Neb. 1976).

549 P.2d 1407 (Jolley v. Jolley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNabney v. McNabney
782 P.2d 1291 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1989)
Woodruff v. Woodruff
573 P.2d 206 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1978)
Armour v. Armour
560 P.2d 148 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1977)
Evans v. Evans
555 P.2d 839 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1976)
Benavidez v. Benavidez
554 P.2d 256 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1976)