Armour v. Armour

Nevada Supreme Court

Armour v. Armour

560 P.2d 148, 93 Nev. 63

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 16, 1977

DocketNo. 8502

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 560 P.2d 148 (Armour v. Armour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armour v. Armour, 560 P.2d 148, 93 Nev. 63 (Neb. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

After the district court entered judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage and distributing the community property, Moment Lea Armour appealed complaining of her share of the property distribution.

After reviewing the record, we believe the distribution was equitable and perceive no abuse of discretion. NRS 125.150; Benavidez v. Benavidez, 92 Nev. 539, 554 P.2d 256 (1976); Jolley v. Jolley, 92 Nev. 298, 549 P.2d 1407 (1976); Todkill v. Todkill, 88 Nev. 231, 495 P.2d 629 (1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

After the district court entered judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage and distributing the community property, Moment Lea Armour appealed complaining of her share of the property distribution.

After reviewing the record, we believe the distribution was equitable and perceive no abuse of discretion. NRS 125.150; Benavidez v. Benavidez, 92 Nev. 539, 554 P.2d 256 (1976); Jolley v. Jolley, 92 Nev. 298, 549 P.2d 1407 (1976); Todkill v. Todkill, 88 Nev. 231, 495 P.2d 629 (1972).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 P.2d 148, 93 Nev. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-v-armour-nev-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack