Armour v. Armour

560 P.2d 148, 93 Nev. 63
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 16, 1977·No. No. 8502·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

After the district court entered judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage and distributing the community property, Moment Lea Armour appealed complaining of her share of the property distribution.

After reviewing the record, we believe the distribution was equitable and perceive no abuse of discretion. NRS 125.150; Benavidez v. Benavidez, 92 Nev. 539, 554 P.2d 256 (1976); Jolley v. Jolley, 92 Nev. 298, 549 P.2d 1407 (1976); Todkill v. Todkill, 88 Nev. 231, 495 P.2d 629 (1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armour v. Armour, 560 P.2d 148, 93 Nev. 63 (Neb. 1977).

560 P.2d 148 (Armour v. Armour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodruff v. Woodruff
573 P.2d 206 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1978)
Canul v. Canul
567 P.2d 476 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1977)