Jokic v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

847 N.E.2d 443, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1464
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 16, 2006·No. 2006-0290·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lake App. No. 2004-L-135, 2005-Ohio-7044. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On February 10, 2006, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4XC),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrae.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jokic v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., 847 N.E.2d 443, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2006).

847 N.E.2d 443 (Jokic v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Continuing Legal Education Suspension of Squires
2017 Ohio 2626 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Troller
2014 Ohio 60 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Sayler
2010 Ohio 1810 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)