Jokic v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Jokic v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

847 N.E.2d 443, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1464

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 16, 2006

Docket2006-0290

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 847 N.E.2d 443 (Jokic v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jokic v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., 847 N.E.2d 443, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Lake App. No. 2004-L-135, 2005-Ohio-7044. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On February 10, 2006, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4XC),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrae.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 2004-L-135, 2005-Ohio-7044. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On February 10, 2006, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4XC),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrae.R. 111(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 N.E.2d 443, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jokic-v-state-auto-mut-ins-co-ohio-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack