Joi Kelly v. C&F Mortgage Corporation
This text of Joi Kelly v. C&F Mortgage Corporation (Joi Kelly v. C&F Mortgage Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-7138 September Term, 2024 1:23-cv-03940-UNA Filed On: June 20, 2025 Joi M. Kelly,
Appellant
v.
C&F Mortgage Corporation,
Appellee
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Pillard, Katsas, and Rao, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order entered March 27, 2024, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case for failure to demonstrate subject-matter jurisdiction. Appellant was required to include in her complaint a short and plain statement of the grounds for the district court’s jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1), but she failed to do so. Nothing in appellant’s complaint suggests that this case presents a federal question. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. And both appellant and the named defendant are citizens of Virginia, meaning that complete diversity is lacking. See id. § 1332(a); In re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litig., 631 F.3d 537, 541 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (“[D]iversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-7138 September Term, 2024
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk
BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joi Kelly v. C&F Mortgage Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joi-kelly-v-cf-mortgage-corporation-cadc-2025.