Johny Rachman v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 408 F. App'x 42 (Johny Rachman v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Johny Rachman, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. “[W]e review for whether substantial evidence supports a finding by clear, unequivocal and convincing evidence that [Rachman] abandoned his lawful permanent residence in the United States.” Khodagholian v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence support’s the agency’s determination that the government met its burden of showing that Rachman lacked a continuous, uninterrupted intention to return to the United States during the eight years he lived in Indonesia. See Chavez-Ramirez v. INS, 792 F.2d 932, 937-38 (9th Cir.1986) (substantial evidence supported finding abandonment of lawful permanent residence where alien spent two and a half years in country of citizenship after the exigency which caused her *43 to return had passed); cf. Khodagholian, 335 F.3d at 1007-09.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 F. App'x 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johny-rachman-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.