Johnston v. Supervisors

19 Johns. 272
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 19 Johns. 272 (Johnston v. Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. Supervisors, 19 Johns. 272 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The party in this case lost nothing by his íeglect to make his election within the time prescribed, as o the mode of having the damages assessed, but his right to lave them assessed by the commissioners appointed by a udge. And the damages having been regularly assessed y two Justices and a jury, in the mode pointed out by the tatute, the board of supervisors were bound, when the apilication was made to them for that purpose, to cause the amages so assessed, with the charges, to be levied and colBcted in the town, pursuant to the statute. The motion >r a mandamus is, therefore, granted.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rains v. Simpson
50 Tex. 495 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)
People ex rel. Yates v. Canal Board
13 Barb. 432 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
People ex rel. Dubois v. Board of Supervisors
3 Barb. 332 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Lyell v. St. Clair County
15 F. Cas. 1137 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1845)
Clark v. Phelps
4 Cow. 190 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Johns. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-supervisors-nysupct-1822.