Johnston v. Supervisors

19 Johns. 272
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1822·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The party in this case lost nothing by his íeglect to make his election within the time prescribed, as o the mode of having the damages assessed, but his right to lave them assessed by the commissioners appointed by a udge. And the damages having been regularly assessed y two Justices and a jury, in the mode pointed out by the tatute, the board of supervisors were bound, when the apilication was made to them for that purpose, to cause the amages so assessed, with the charges, to be levied and colBcted in the town, pursuant to the statute. The motion >r a mandamus is, therefore, granted.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnston v. Supervisors, 19 Johns. 272 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

19 Johns. 272 (Johnston v. Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rains v. Simpson
50 Tex. 495 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)
People ex rel. Yates v. Canal Board
13 Barb. 432 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
People ex rel. Dubois v. Board of Supervisors
3 Barb. 332 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Lyell v. St. Clair County
15 F. Cas. 1137 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1845)
Clark v. Phelps
4 Cow. 190 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)