Johnston v. Hedden

2 Johns. Cas. 274
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1801
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 274 (Johnston v. Hedden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. Hedden, 2 Johns. Cas. 274 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The declaration is sufficient. Pounds are not a foreign or unknown money of account. The act requires that all accounts arising from proceeding in the courts of justice within this state, except as to bills of costs, and all judgments shall be in dollars, <fcc. This is not an account or demand arising from proceedings in a court of justice, and, therefore, it was not even necessary to state the value in dollars. The court will, as before, ex officio, take notice of the value of pounds ; and in rendering judgment, convert them into dollars. Besides, the value is here stated, and that is sufficient to direct the-judgment.

There must be judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment for the plaintiff.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Derinza's Case
229 Mass. 435 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Hunter v. N. Y., Ontario & Western R. Co.
23 N.E. 9 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Hunter v. New York, Ontario & Western Railroad
116 N.Y. 615 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-hedden-nysupct-1801.