Johnson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Johnson v. United States

658 A.2d 1035, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 105, 1995 WL 327200

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 24, 1995

DocketNo. 91-CF-5

StatusPublished

This text of 658 A.2d 1035 (Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. United States, 658 A.2d 1035, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 105, 1995 WL 327200 (D.C. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 10, 1994, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 5, 1995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI