Johnson v. State
This text of 688 S.W.2d 560 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
A jury convicted appellant of attempted rape and assessed punishment at seven years’ confinement and a $5,000 fine. The court of appeals for the first supreme judicial district affirmed the conviction. We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address alleged fundamental error in the charge.
In accord with our decision in Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157 (opinion on rehearing — delivered February 27, 1985), we remand this case to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Almanza.
ONION, P.J., and W.C. DAVIS, J., dissent to the remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 S.W.2d 560, 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-texcrimapp-1985.