Johnson v. State
143 S.W. 1165, 65 Tex. Crim. 416, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 124
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 24, 1912·No. No. 1554.·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
This appeal must be dismissed for want of a recognizance. There is in the record what purports to be an appeal bond signed by appellant' and two sureties. It is not a recognizance but an appeal bond. This is not a sufficient compliance with *417 the law, and the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General must be sustained.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 143 S.W. 1165, 65 Tex. Crim. 416, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 124 (Tex. 1912).
143 S.W. 1165 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burks v. State
260 S.W. 181 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Welch v. State
199 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Bennett v. State
194 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Knowlton and Dominguez v. State
169 S.W. 674 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)