Johnson v. State

1921 OK CR 222, 201 P. 1008, 20 Okla. Crim. 194, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 157
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 21, 1921
DocketNo. A-3659.
StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 222 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 1921 OK CR 222, 201 P. 1008, 20 Okla. Crim. 194, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 157 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction rendered upon the verdict of a jury, finding the defendant, Diek Johnson, guilty of rape in the first degree, and fixing his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for 20 years. The information charges that Dick Johnson, Forest Johnson, Raymond Scaggs, and Dan Scaggs, did in Delaware county, on or about the 13th day of August, 1919, unlawfully, feloniously, and by force and violence overcoming her resistance, have sexual intercourse with Lillie Hayes, she, the said1 Lillie Hayes, not being the wife of either of said defendants. A severance was granted, and upon the defendant, Dick Johnson’s separate trial, the jury returned their verdict as above stated.

This case is a companion case' to that of Forest Johnson v. State, affirmed at this term, 20 Okla. Cr. 196, 201 Pac. 1006. The testimony was, in substance, the same, and the assignments of error are the same. Counsel for the defendant, by agreement with counsel for the state, submitted the cause upon their briefs filed in the companion case of Forest Johnson v. State, where this court held adversely to the contentions made.

*196 Upon consideration of the whole case we are satisfied that the substantial rights of the defendant have not been prejudiced by reason of any error of law appearing in the record. As shown by the record the defendant has had a fair and impartial trial and we think the testimony, without any doubt, is ample to sustain the conviction. The judgment of the district court of Delaware county is therefore affirmed.

MATSON and BESSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
1921 OK CR 223 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1921 OK CR 222, 201 P. 1008, 20 Okla. Crim. 194, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1921.