Johnson v. State

33 S.E. 641, 108 Ga. 771, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 381
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 33 S.E. 641 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 33 S.E. 641, 108 Ga. 771, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 381 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Little, J.

The necessary absence, in attendance on a superior court, of an attorney who represented the accused being tried in a city court, is no ground for continuance of the latter case, when it appears that the leading counsel of the accused on trial in the city court was present and conducted the defense. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices con,carring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 S.E. 641, 108 Ga. 771, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-ga-1899.