Johnson v. State
183 So. 2d 862, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5623
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 1966·No. No. 65-783·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Pi-ocedure Rule I, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The grounds upon which relief is sought are an attempt to review the sufficiency of the evidence.
A motion under Criminal Procedure Rule I may not be used as a substitute for an appeal upon the merits. Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 27; Austin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 730.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 183 So. 2d 862, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5623 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
183 So. 2d 862 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harrington v. State
388 So. 2d 34 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Miller v. State
240 So. 2d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)