Harrington v. State
388 So. 2d 34, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17991
Opinion
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See: Mitchell v. State, 167 So.2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Johnson v. State, 183 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Wedenfeller v. State, 355 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harrington v. State, 388 So. 2d 34, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17991 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
388 So. 2d 34 (Harrington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wedenfeller v. State
355 So. 2d 193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Mitchell v. State
167 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Johnson v. State
183 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)