Harrington v. State
This text of 388 So. 2d 34 (Harrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See: Mitchell v. State, 167 So.2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Johnson v. State, 183 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Wedenfeller v. State, 355 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 So. 2d 34, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.