Johnson v. State

753 So. 2d 555, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 608, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2175, 1999 WL 1190958
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 16, 1999·No. No. 94,801·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the opinion in Johnson v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2419, — So.2d -, 1998 WL 746142 (Fla 4th DCA Oct. 28, 1998), which certified conflict with the opinions in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and State v. Perry, 716 So.2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 753 So. 2d 555, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 608, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2175, 1999 WL 1190958 (Fla. 1999).

753 So. 2d 555 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
796 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
The Florida Bar v. Temmer
753 So. 2d 555 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)