Johnson v. State

716 So. 2d 787, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 445, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1671, 1998 WL 559011
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 769 So. 2d 990
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 4, 1998·No. No. 91328·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Johnson, 696 So.2d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), based upon express and direct conflict with Evans v. State, 546 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. However, after hearing oral argument, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the petition for review is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS and PARIENTE, JJ, concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 716 So. 2d 787, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 445, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1671, 1998 WL 559011 (Fla. 1998).

716 So. 2d 787 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
696 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Evans v. State
546 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)