Johnson v. State

42 So. 2d 836, 34 Ala. App. 649, 1949 Ala. App. LEXIS 495
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1949·No. 1 Div. 600.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CARR, Judge.

This appeal is here on the record without a transcription of the evidence. Under these circumstances we are not privileged to review the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, nor the propriety vel non of the refusal of the written charges tendered by the appellant. Graham v. State, 16 Ala.App. 87, 75 So. 635; Thorne v. State, 21 Ala.App. 57, 105 So. 709; York v. State, ante, p. 188, 39 So.2d 694.

The record is in every respect regular, and the judgment of the court below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 42 So. 2d 836, 34 Ala. App. 649, 1949 Ala. App. LEXIS 495 (Ala. Ct. App. 1949).

42 So. 2d 836 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodman v. State
52 So. 2d 166 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)