Graham v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Graham v. State

75 So. 635, 16 Ala. App. 87, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 154

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1917

Docket6 Div. 306.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 75 So. 635 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. State, 75 So. 635, 16 Ala. App. 87, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 154 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of eight years. The record in this case contains no bill of exceptions. No *88 question was raised relative to the sufficiency ’of the indictment, and no exception was reserved to any portion of the oral charge of the court. The only refused charge was the general affirmative charge in favor of the defendant, and this charge cannot be reviewed in the absence of a bill of exceptions. Cobb v. State, 115 Ala. 18, 22 South. 506; Frazier v. State, 71 South. 981. 1

We have carefully examined, the record, and find it free from error, and the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

Reported In full in the Southern Reporter; reported as a memorandum decision without opinion in 14 Ala. App. 665.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of eight years. The record in this case contains no bill of exceptions. No *88 question was raised relative to the sufficiency ’of the indictment, and no exception was reserved to any portion of the oral charge of the court. The only refused charge was the general affirmative charge in favor of the defendant, and this charge cannot be reviewed in the absence of a bill of exceptions. Cobb v. State, 115 Ala. 18, 22 South. 506; Frazier v. State, 71 South. 981. 1

We have carefully examined, the record, and find it free from error, and the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

Reported In full in the Southern Reporter; reported as a memorandum decision without opinion in 14 Ala. App. 665.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 So. 635, 16 Ala. App. 87, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-alactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack