Johnson v. State

158 So. 458, 26 Ala. App. 327, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 49
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 365
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 12, 1935·No. 5 Div. 958.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The propositions of law presented in this record are not new or novel, and have many times been decided by this court;

The only question is, Do the facts justify a conviction from the circumstances proven?

That the defendant was in constructive possession of parts of a still suitable to be used in the manufacture of whisky is unquestioned. That such possession was such as to prove a guilty knowledge on the part of defendant could legitimately be inferred from the facts proven.

These facts being established to the satisfaction of the jury beyond a reasonable doubt, it became a jury question as to whether the still was complete. All these questions were submitted to the jury under the charge of the court.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 158 So. 458, 26 Ala. App. 327, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 49 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

158 So. 458 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.