Johnson v. State

153 So. 667, 26 Ala. App. 87, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 29
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 291
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1934·No. 8 Div. 945.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charged appellant with the offense of having in his, possession, etc., a still, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing or distilling prohibited liquors or beverages.

The trial resulted in a verdict by the jury finding him guilty as charged, whereupon, as *88 the law requires, the court sentenced him to seyve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary of not less than eighteen months nor more than two years. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered.

No point of decision other than the regularity of the record is presented, there being no bill of exceptions. In the absence of. a bill of exceptions, the trial court’s ruling on a motion for new trial cannot be considered. The record is regular; therefore the judgment of conviction in the bower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 153 So. 667, 26 Ala. App. 87, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 29 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

153 So. 667 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.