Johnson v. Shreve

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Shreve

63 F. App'x 775

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2003·No. No. 03-6504·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Lacy Hughes Johnson appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (2000) his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Shreve, No. CA-03-202-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Lacy Hughes Johnson appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (2000) his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Shreve, No. CA-03-202-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Shreve, 63 F. App'x 775 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

63 F. App'x 775 (Johnson v. Shreve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related