Johnson v. Schaefer Co.
228 A.D. 810
Opinion
Judgments affirmed, "with costs. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; Finch and Sherman, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that an issue of fact was involved which should have been submitted to the jury, on the authority of Wood v. Third Avenue R. R. Co. (91 Hun, 276, at p. 277; affd., 157 N. Y. 696).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Schaefer Co., 228 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
228 A.D. 810 (Johnson v. Schaefer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. . Third Avenue Railroad Company
51 N.E. 1091 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Wood v. Third Ave. Railroad
36 N.Y.S. 253 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)