Johnson v. Schaefer Co.
This text of 228 A.D. 810 (Johnson v. Schaefer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments affirmed, "with costs. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; Finch and Sherman, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that an issue of fact was involved which should have been submitted to the jury, on the authority of Wood v. Third Avenue R. R. Co. (91 Hun, 276, at p. 277; affd., 157 N. Y. 696).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D. 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-schaefer-co-nyappdiv-1930.